Editorial policy
How we report, how we test, and what we won't publish. Every route report and gear review is held to this standard.
- Effective
- ‹date›
What we publish
- Route reports from roads we have driven.
- Gear reviews of items we have used in the field.
- Buyer's guides that compare what we've carried for a region.
- Journal essays and field notes.
Dated, not timeless
Every route report carries the date we last drove it. Every gear review states how long we tested the item, and over what distance or how many nights. Those fields appear on the card and on the page, so you can judge how current a report is before you read it.
How we test gear
We review gear after using it in real conditions, for long enough that its weak points show. We say what an item is bad at as plainly as what it's good at. A buyer's guide names a pick only once we've carried it, and where testing isn't finished, the page says so.
Facts we won't invent
Distances, dates driven, test durations, prices and bylines are facts. If we don't have one yet, the page shows it as pending instead of filling the gap with a plausible number. We don't invent star ratings, testers or credentials.
If we don't have a fact yet, the page says so.
Independence
Makers don't approve, preview or edit reviews. When a maker has supplied an item for testing, the review says so. Sponsored content is labelled Sponsored, and sponsorship never buys a place in a buyer's guide.
How we earn money from links is explained in our affiliate disclosure.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, we fix it and say so on the page, with the date of the correction. Send corrections to ‹contact email›.
Photography
Images are our own or openly licensed. Openly licensed images are credited with their licence on the image credits page.



